On 2/28/17 20:01, Lukas Fittl wrote: > Currently pg_stat_statements replaces constant values with ? characters. > I've seen this be a problem on multiple occasions, in particular since > it conflicts with the use of ? as an operator. > > I'd like to propose changing the replacement character from ? to instead > be a parameter (like $1).
Hmm, I think this could confuse people into thinking that the queries displayed were in fact prepared queries. Maybe we could gather some more ideas. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers