On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> My guess is that if we apply the fix I suggested above, it'll be good >> enough. If that turns out not to be true, then I guess we'll have to >> deal with that, but why not do the easy thing first? > > Okay, that is also a sensible approach. Your patch looks good to me, > though I have not tested it.
Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers