On 2/13/17 8:59 PM, Haribabu Kommi wrote: > The current patch that I shared doesn't contains the plan and executor > changes to show > the performance benefit of the clustered index. we used custom plan to > generate the plan > for the clustered index. Currently I am working on it to rebase it to > current master and > other necessary changes. > > In the current state of the patch, I cannot take any performance tests, > as it needs some > major changes according to the latest PostgreSQL version. I have an old > performance > report that is took on 9.5 attached for your reference. > > The current patch that is shared is to find out the best approach in > developing a columnar > storage in PostgreSQL, by adopting Index access methods + additional > hooks or pluggable > storage access methods?
While this looks like it could be a really significant performance improvement, I think the above demonstrates that it needs a lot of work. I know this is not new to the 2017-03 CF but it doesn't seem enough progress has been made since posting to allow it to be committed in time for v10. I recommend moving this patch to the 2017-07 CF. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
