On 3/3/17 16:16, David Steele wrote: > While this looks like it could be a really significant performance > improvement, I think the above demonstrates that it needs a lot of work. > I know this is not new to the 2017-03 CF but it doesn't seem enough > progress has been made since posting to allow it to be committed in time > for v10. > > I recommend moving this patch to the 2017-07 CF.
I think the patch that was in 2017-01 was given some feedback that put the fundamental approach in question, which the author appeared to agree with. So I don't know why this patch appeared in this CF at all. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
