On 3/3/17 16:16, David Steele wrote:
> While this looks like it could be a really significant performance
> improvement, I think the above demonstrates that it needs a lot of work.
>  I know this is not new to the 2017-03 CF but it doesn't seem enough
> progress has been made since posting to allow it to be committed in time
> for v10.
> I recommend moving this patch to the 2017-07 CF.

I think the patch that was in 2017-01 was given some feedback that put
the fundamental approach in question, which the author appeared to agree
with.  So I don't know why this patch appeared in this CF at all.

Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to