On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh.  But then I don't see why you need min_parallel_anything.  That's
> just based on an estimate of the amount of data per worker vs.
> maintenance_work_mem, isn't it?

Yes -- and it's generally a pretty good estimate.

I don't really know what minimum amount of memory to insist workers
have, which is why I provisionally chose one of those GUCs as the

Any better ideas?

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to