On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like to err on the side of the approach that requires fewer changes. > That is, if the question is "does pg_restore need to treat this issue > specially?" and the answer is unclear, I like to assume it probably > doesn't until some contrary evidence emerges. > > I mean, sometimes it is clear that you are going to need special > handling someplace, and then you have to do it. But I don't see that > this is one of those cases, necessarily.
That's what I'll do, then. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
