On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 02:49:36PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/1/17 08:36, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 2/22/17 18:24, Jim Nasby wrote:
> >>> Yes, by that logic matview refresh should always be last.
> >> Patches for head attached.
> >> RLS was the first item added after DO_REFRESH_MATVIEW, which was added
> >> in 9.5. So if we want to treat this as a bug, they'd need to be patched
> >> as well, which is a simple matter of swapping 33 and 34.
> > I wonder whether we should emphasize this change by assigning
> > DO_REFRESH_MATVIEW a higher number, like 100?
> Since there wasn't any interest in that idea, I have committed Jim's
> patch as is.
Would this be a candidate for backpatching, or is the behaviour change
in pg_dump trumping the issues it solves?
Projektleiter / Senior Berater
Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171
Fax: +49 2166 9901-100
credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: