Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > auth.c: In function `pg_krb5_recvauth': > > > auth.c:294: structure has no member named `user' > > > > Ooops, my fault --- I didn't build with Kerberos support after > > changing those field names. > > > > Now that I think about it, there might be similar omissions in the > > PAM or Kerberos4 support --- can anyone try those? > > krb4 code should be removed from PostgreSQL ASAP for various > insecurities in the protocol. It's been removed from FreeBSD, MIT, > and Heimdal's code base and is officially unsupported as of June this > year. -sc
Did we decide we _didn't_ want to remove krb4? Removal seems like a good idea to me, but I am just checking if the consensus was to keep it. I think someone said it was OK in a closed environment or something. Maybe we need to document that it is not recommended. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
