On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM, David Rowley
> <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 7 March 2017 at 15:21, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1. How about changing the description of
>>> max_parallel_workers_per_gather to "taken from max_worker_processes,
>>> limited by max_parallel_workers"?
>> Thanks for looking.
>> Seems more accurate to say that it's "taken from
>> max_parallel_workers", maybe.
> I thought of saying similar to what we have in docs, however the way
> you have written works for me.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: