Robert Haas <> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Tom Lane <> wrote:
>> Is there a good reason why RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE is 'P' not 'p'?

> I can't muster a lot of outrage about this one way or another.  One
> possible advantage of 'P' is that there are fewer places where 'P' is
> mentioned in the source code than 'p'.

Hm, one would hope that the vast majority of code references are neither
of those, but rather "RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE".  information_schema.sql
and system_views.sql will need to be gone over carefully, certainly, but
we shouldn't be hard-coding this anywhere that there's a reasonable

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to