Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> (And no, I don't especially
>> approve of RELKIND_SEQUENCE being 'S' either, but it's far too late to
>> change that.)
> FWIW the reason SEQUENCE uses S instead of 's' is that the latter was
> taken for "special" relations, which we removed a few releases ago
> (commit 3a694bb0a1).
Yeah, I'd just been reminded of that by some code in describe.c.
So there actually is a reason for sequences to be 'S', or once was.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
