Mark Dilger <hornschnor...@gmail.com> writes:
> You appear to be using a #define macro to wrap a function of the same name
> with the code:
> #define copyObject(obj) ((typeof(obj)) copyObject(obj))
> I don't necessarily have a problem with that, but it struck me as a bit odd,
> and
> grep'ing through the sources, I don't see anywhere else in the project where
> that
> is done for a function of the same number of arguments, and only one other
> place where it is done at all:
I agree that that seems like a bad idea. Better to rename the underlying
function --- for one thing, that provides an "out" if some caller doesn't
want this behavior.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
