On 3/21/17 18:52, Mark Dilger wrote: > The patch applies cleanly, compiles, and passes all the regression tests > for me on my laptop. Peter appears to have renamed the function copyObject > as copyObjectImpl, which struct me as odd when I first saw it, but I don't > have > a better name in mind, so that seems ok.
Committed that. > If the purpose of this patch is to avoid casting so many things down to (Node > *), > perhaps some additional work along the lines of the patch I'm attaching are > appropriate. (This patch applies on top Peter's v2 patch). The idea being to > keep objects as (Expr *) where appropriate, rather than casting through (Node > *) > quite so much. And that. The distinction between Node and Expr is more theoretical and not handled very ridigly throughout the code. However, your patch seemed like a gentle improvement in relatively new code, so it seems like a good change. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
