On 3/9/17 18:39, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> With the addition of transition tables we have all four, although
> I'm not sure whether the CREATE TRIGGER statement conforms closely
> enough to claim the feature.  The two basic issues I can think of
> are:
>  - we don't allow the OLD and NEW transition variable names to be
>    specified -- using hard-coded values instead
>  - we don't support the standard <triggered SQL statement> formats,
>    instead supporting only our EXECUTE PROCEDURE syntax
> Do we leave T211, "Basic trigger capability" on our "unsupported"
> list until those two points are addressed?

Those seem pretty big ones.

Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to