Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I have confirmed on jacana Petr's observation that adding a timeout to > the WaitLatchOrSocket cures the problem.
Does anyone have a theory as to why that cures the problem? What length of timeout is being suggested here? Would a long timeout perhaps create a performance issue? That is, I'm wondering if the wait actually sleeps to the end of the timeout in the problem case(s). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers