On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Fine! I've committed the pg_clog renaming, but I'd really like to >> draw the line here. I'm not going to commit the pg_subtrans -> >> pg_subxact naming and am -1 on anyone else doing so. I think that >> having the names of things in the code match what shows up in the file >> system is an awfully desirable property which we should preserve >> insofar as we can do so without compromising other goals. Not >> invalidating what users and DBAs think they know about how PostgreSQL >> works is a good thing, too; there are a lot more people who know >> something about the directory layout than will read this thread. > > I'm cool with that, thanks for the commit.
monitoring.sgml still has some references to "clog". We should update them? Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
