On 4 February 2017 at 09:33, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> For pretty much else that logic seems worse, > because it essentially prevents any buffers ever staying in s_b when > only ringbuffer accesses are performed. That was exactly its intent. The ringbuffer was designed to avoid cache spoiling by large scans. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
