On 3/16/17 12:48 PM, David Steele wrote:
This patch looks pretty straight forward and applies cleanly and
compiles at cccbdde.

It's not a straight revert, though, so still seems to need review.

Jim, do you know when you'll have a chance to look at that?

Yes. Compiles and passes for me as well.

One minor point: previously the code did

  if (buf->usage_count < BM_MAX_USAGE_COUNT)

but now it does

  if (BUF_STATE_GET_USAGECOUNT(buf_state) != BM_MAX_USAGE_COUNT)

being prone to paranoia, I prefer the first, but I've seen both styles in the code so I don't know if it's worth futzing with.

Marked as RFC.
--
Jim Nasby, Chief Data Architect, Austin TX
OpenSCG                 http://OpenSCG.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to