> On 20 Mar 2017, at 15:17, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I thought about having special field (or reusing one of the existing fields)
>> in snapshot struct to force filtering xmax > snap->xmax or xmin = snap->xmin
>> as Petr suggested. Then this logic can reside in ReorderBufferCommit().
>> However this is not solving problem with catcache, so I'm looking into it
>> right now.
> OK, so this is only an issue if we have xacts that change the schema
> of tables and also insert/update/delete to their heaps. Right?
> So, given that this is CF3 for Pg10, should we take a step back and
> impose the limitation that we can decode 2PC with schema changes or
> data row changes, but not both?
Yep, time is tight. I’ll try today/tomorrow to proceed with this two scan
If I’ll fail to do that during this time then I’ll just update this patch to
only non-ddl 2pc transactions as you suggested.
>> Just as before I marking this transaction committed in snapbuilder, but after
>> decoding I delete this transaction from xip (which holds committed
>> in case of historic snapshot).
> That seems kind of hacky TBH. I didn't much like marking it as
> committed then un-committing it.
> I think it's mostly an interface issue though. I'd rather say
> SnapBuildPushPrepareTransaction and SnapBuildPopPreparedTransaction or
> something, to make it clear what we're doing.
Yes, that will be less confusing. However there is no any kind of queue, so
SnapBuildStartPrepare / SnapBuildFinishPrepare should work too.
> Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: