Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> Do you have test case, which can reproduce the issue you >> explained above?
> No. It would require some surgery in standard_planner() to measure the > memory consumed in the planner context OR build the code with > SHOW_MEMORY_STATS defined and dump memory context statistics and check > planner context memory usage. I don't think I can produce a testcase > quickly right now. But then, I think the problem is quite apparent > from the code inspection alone, esp. comparing what mark_dummy_rel() > does with what create_unique_path() is doing. Yeah. I think the code in mark_dummy_rel is newer and better-thought-out than what's in create_unique_path. It probably makes sense to change over. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers