On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I think it would have been probably okay to use *int* for ntuples as > >> that matches with what you are actually assigning in the function. > > > > okay, corrected it. Attached is newer version of patch. > > > > Thanks, this version looks good to me. > It solves the problem for me. I'd like to test that I get the right answer on the standby, not just the absence of a crash, but I don't know how to do that effectively. Has anyone used the new wal replay block consistency tool on hash indexes since this microvacuum code was committed? Jeff
