> On 28 Mar 2017, at 00:19, Stas Kelvich <s.kelv...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> 
> * It is actually doesn’t pass one of mine regression tests. I’ve added 
> expected output
> as it should be. I’ll try to send follow up message with fix, but right now 
> sending it
> as is, as you asked.
> 
> 

Fixed. I forgot to postpone ReorderBufferTxn cleanup in case of prepare.

So it pass provided regression tests right now.

I’ll give it more testing tomorrow and going to write TAP test to check 
behaviour
when we loose info whether prepare was sent to subscriber or not.


Attachment: logical_twophase.diff
Description: Binary data



Stas Kelvich
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to