On 28 March 2017 at 08:50, Stas Kelvich <s.kelv...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > >> On 28 Mar 2017, at 00:19, Stas Kelvich <s.kelv...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> >> * It is actually doesn’t pass one of mine regression tests. I’ve added >> expected output >> as it should be. I’ll try to send follow up message with fix, but right now >> sending it >> as is, as you asked. >> >> > > Fixed. I forgot to postpone ReorderBufferTxn cleanup in case of prepare. > > So it pass provided regression tests right now. > > I’ll give it more testing tomorrow and going to write TAP test to check > behaviour > when we loose info whether prepare was sent to subscriber or not.
Great, thanks. I'll try to have some TAP tests ready. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
