Fujii Masao wrote: > This is the evidence that no one cares about the details of VACUUM VERBOSE > output example. So I'm tempted to simplify the example (please see the > attached patch) instead of keeping updating the example.
Agreed. > > If this patch is applied, it should back-patch to all supported > > branches. > > Not sure if it's worth back-patching that. I see no reason to keep it in back branches either. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers