Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Perhaps we could satisfy novices by changing the out-of-the-box >> behavior, but provide some way to select the old behavior for >> installations that are really depending on it.
> Hmm. I guess that would mean that the same connection string would > mean something different depending on how you configured this > behavior, which does not sound like a good idea. But why not go the > other way and just create the default database by default, either in > addition to or instead of the postgres database? What "default database"? Are you suggesting that createuser should forcibly create a similarly-named database? Doesn't sound like a great idea to me; it's presuming what seems like minority usage. If we were to do anything about this, my sketch of a desirable solution would be to invent a GUC named something like "default_database", which would specify the DB to connect to when the incoming request packet doesn't name one. We could have it be "postgres" out of the box, but allow the value "$user" to select the old behavior. However ... a little bit of research shows that this behavior is wired into libpq as well as the backend, and that therefore the backend's code path that inserts the username as the default DB name is dead code (at least when processing libpq-driven connection requests; I don't know what JDBC and other client libraries do). This means that there isn't any really centralized way to fix it. We could delete that behavior from libpq easily enough, but then we'd have a situation where the behavior varies depending on which version of which client library you're using. I'm afraid now that changing this would be far more pain than it could possibly be worth. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers