On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In short, it seems like this statement in the docs is correctly describing
> our code's behavior, but said behavior is wrong and should be changed.
> I'd propose fixing it like that in HEAD; I'm not sure if the back branches
> should also be changed.

Sounds reasonable, but I don't see much advantage to changing it in
the back-branches.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to