"Daniel Verite" <dan...@manitou-mail.org> writes: > I've noticed two issues with the query buffer post-commit e984ef5 > (Support \if ... \elif ... \else ... \endif in psql scripting):
> 1. \p ignores the "previous buffer". Example: Yeah, I did that intentionally, thinking that the old behavior was confusing. We can certainly discuss it though. I'd tend to agree with your point that \p and \w should print the same thing, but maybe neither of them should look at the previous_buf. > 2. \r keeps the "previous buffer". I think it should clear it. I don't really agree with this. The fact that it used to clear both buffers was an implementation accident that probably nobody had even understood clearly. ISTM that loses functionality because you can't do \g anymore. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers