On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2017-04-01 01:22:14 +0000, Robert Haas wrote: > >> Avoid GatherMerge crash when there are no workers. > > > > I think the gather merge code needs a bit more test coverage (sorry to > > make this a larger theme today). As shown by > > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/executor/ > nodeGatherMerge.c.gcov.html > > we don't actually merge anything (heap_compare_slots is not exercised). > > Sounds reasonable. > I am working on this and will submit the patch soon. > > > I btw also wonder if it's good that we have a nearly identical copy of > > heap_compare_slots and a bunch of the calling code in both > > nodeMergeAppend.c and nodeGatherMerge.c. On the other hand, it's not > > heavily envolving code. > > Yeah, I don't know. We could alternatively try to move that to some > common location and merge the two implementations. I'm not sure > exactly where, though. > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Rushabh Lathia