On 2017-04-03 11:22:02 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 4/3/17 09:07, Michael Paquier wrote: > > I had for some time a WIP patch on which dust has accumulated, so > > attached is a more polished version. In more details, here is what > > happens: > > - test.sh is removed. > > - vcregress.pl loses upgradecheck. > > - The new test is added. In the case of MSVC this is now part of bincheck. > > Patch has been tested on macos and Windows. > > This is a useful start. What I'd really like to see is that instead of > running the full serial tests to populate the pre-upgrade database, we > determine a useful subset of what that ends up generating and just > populate with that.
That doesn't strike as particularly future proof. We intentionally leave objects behind pg_regress runs, but that only works if we actually run them... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers