On 4/3/17 11:32, Andres Freund wrote: > That doesn't strike as particularly future proof. We intentionally > leave objects behind pg_regress runs, but that only works if we actually > run them...
I generally agree with the sentiments expressed later in this thread. But just to clarify what I meant here: We don't need to run a, say, 1-minute serial test to load a few "left behind" objects for the pg_upgrade test, if we can load the same set of objects using dedicated scripting in say 2 seconds. This would make both the pg_upgrade tests faster and would reduce the hidden dependencies in the main tests about which kinds of objects need to be left behind. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
