On 4/6/17 07:13, Beena Emerson wrote: > Does the options 16, 64 and 1024 seem good. > We can remove sizes below 16 as most have agreed and as per the > discussion, 64MB and 1GB seems favoured. We could probably allow 32MB > since it was an already allowed size?
I don't see the need to remove any options right now. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers