On 4/6/17 07:13, Beena Emerson wrote:
> Does the options 16, 64 and 1024 seem good. 
> We can remove sizes below 16 as most have agreed and as per the
> discussion, 64MB and 1GB seems favoured. We could probably allow 32MB
> since it was an already allowed size? 

I don't see the need to remove any options right now.

Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to