> On Apr 8, 2017, at 6:38 PM, Mark Dilger <hornschnor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Apr 8, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> I wrote: >>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> I think it's pretty dubious to change this, honestly. Just because it >>>> would have caught this one bug doesn't make it an especially valuable >>>> thing in general. Bytes are still not free. >> >>> What I think I might do is write a trial patch that turns Bitmapsets >>> into Nodes, and see if it catches any other existing bugs. If it does >>> not, that would be good evidence for your position. >> >> I made the attached quick-hack patch, and found that check-world >> passes just fine with it. > > Not so for me. I get a failure almost immediately:
I recant. Looks like I didn't get the patch applied quite right. So sorry for the noise. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
