On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Maksim Milyutin <m.milyu...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > 1. I have added a new relkind for local indexes named RELKIND_LOCAL_INDEX > (literal 'l').
Seems like it should maybe be RELKIND_PARTITIONED_INDEX. There's nothing particularly "local" about it. I suppose what you're going for is that it's not global, but in a way it *is* global to the partitioning hierarchy. That's the point. It's just that it's partitioned. > Perhaps, it's not good way to use pg_depend to determine the relationship > between parent and child indexes because the kind of this relationship is > not defined. I could propose to add into pg_index table specific field of > 'oidvector' type that specify oids of dependent indexes for the current > local index. I agree with Greg's comment on this point. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
