On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:33:34AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I think there is no clear agreement here, and no historically consistent > > behavior. I'm prepared to let it go and cross it off the list of open > > items. I believe we should keep thinking about it, but it's not > > something that has to hold up beta. > > Agreed, this doesn't seem like a must-fix-for-beta consideration.
Definitely not a beta blocker, agreed. Would it be okay to release v10 final with the logical replication launcher soft-failing this way? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
