Sorry, here's the right one. On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:27 PM, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 12 April 2017 at 21:45, Ashutosh Bapat > <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:18 PM, David Rowley >> <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On 10 March 2017 at 17:33, Ashutosh Bapat >>> <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>>> Yes and I also forgot to update the function prologue to refer to the >>>> fpinfo_o/i instead of inner and outer relations. Attached patch >>>> corrects it. >>> >>> Hi Ashutosh, >>> >>> This seems to have conflicted with 28b04787. Do you want to rebase, or >>> should I? >> >> Here you go. > > Looks like the wrong patch. > > > -- > David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
-- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
foreign_outerjoin_pushdown_fix_v5.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
