Sorry, here's the right one.

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:27 PM, David Rowley
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12 April 2017 at 21:45, Ashutosh Bapat
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:18 PM, David Rowley
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 10 March 2017 at 17:33, Ashutosh Bapat
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Yes and I also forgot to update the function prologue to refer to the
>>>> fpinfo_o/i instead of inner and outer relations. Attached patch
>>>> corrects it.
>>>
>>> Hi Ashutosh,
>>>
>>> This seems to have conflicted with 28b04787. Do you want to rebase, or 
>>> should I?
>>
>> Here you go.
>
> Looks like the wrong patch.
>
>
> --
>  David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
>  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Attachment: foreign_outerjoin_pushdown_fix_v5.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to