On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Pierre Ducroquet <p.p...@pinaraf.info> wrote:
> Yesterday while doing a few pg_basebackup, I realized that the integer
> parameters were not properly checked against invalid input.
> It is not a critical issue, but this could be misleading for an user who
> writes -z max or -s 0.5…
> I've attached the patch to this mail. Should I add it to the next commit fest
> or is it not needed for such small patches ?
A call to atoi is actually equivalent to strtol with the rounding:
(int)strtol(str, (char **)NULL, 10);
So I don't think this is worth caring.
By doing a git grep "atoi(optarg)" you'll see far more places that
handle integer options this way as well...
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: