On 2017/04/14 16:25, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 14 April 2017 at 08:13, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> Attached patch gets rid of a "is has".
> Yes, its a typo, but doesn't add missing information or change the meaning.
> It should be fixed, but could I suggest we include that in your next
> lot of doc changes, rather than keep making single minor changes?

Sorry, I'm not working on any new doc changes at the moment, because...

> (I had understood that we were going to add more docs together, but I
> was awaiting your restructuring patch)

The restructuring patch was committed on Apr 1st, after I posted the first
version of the patch on March 3rd here:


The committed version:



Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to