On 2017/04/14 16:25, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 14 April 2017 at 08:13, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > >> Attached patch gets rid of a "is has". > > Yes, its a typo, but doesn't add missing information or change the meaning. > > It should be fixed, but could I suggest we include that in your next > lot of doc changes, rather than keep making single minor changes?
Sorry, I'm not working on any new doc changes at the moment, because... > (I had understood that we were going to add more docs together, but I > was awaiting your restructuring patch) The restructuring patch was committed on Apr 1st, after I posted the first version of the patch on March 3rd here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4eb8cfe4-b6c9-903d-4ce8-2a31fcee27e1%40lab.ntt.co.jp The committed version: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=8f18a880a5f138d4da94173d15514142331f8de6 Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
