On 13 April 2017 at 18:47, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But on second thought, I don't think that reporting NULL as the priority when > quorum-based sync replication is used is less confusing. When there is async > standby, we report 0 as its priority when synchronous_standby_names is empty > or a priority-based sync replication is configured. But with the patch, when > a quorum-based one is specified, NULL is reported for that. > Isn't this confusing? To me, yes, it is confusing. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
