On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 09:51:02PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 12:48:56AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 09:49:58PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > > >> (2) > > >> There will be still many source comments and documentations that > > >> we need to update, for example, in high-availability.sgml. We need to > > >> check and update them throughly. > > >> > > >> (3) > > >> The priority value is assigned to each standby listed in s_s_names > > >> even in quorum commit though those priority values are not used at all. > > >> Users can see those priority values in pg_stat_replication. > > >> Isn't this confusing? If yes, it might be better to always assign 1 as > > >> the priority, for example. > > Regarding the item (2), Sawada-san told me that he will work on it after > > this CommitFest finishes. So we would receive the patch for the item from > > him next week. If there will be no patch even after the end of next week > > (i.e., April 14th), I will. Let's wait for Sawada-san's action at first. > > Sounds reasonable; I will look for your update on 14Apr or earlier. This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com > Since you do want (3) to change, please own it like any other open item, > including the mandatory status updates. Likewise. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
