On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 4/10/17 06:18, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> This isn't exactly about this particular thread. But I noticed, that
>> after we introduced RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE, we required to change a
>> number of conditions to include this relkind. We missed some places in
>> initial commits and fixed those later. I am wondering whether we
>> should creates macros clubbing relevant relkinds together based on the
>> purpose of the tests e.g. IS_RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE(). When a new relkind
>> is added, one can examine these macros to check whether the new
>> relkind fits in the given macro. If all those macros are placed
>> together, there is a high chance that we will not miss any place in
>> the initial commit itself.
> I think this is worth a try.

Thanks, will try to come up with something ASAP.

Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to