On 24 April 2017 at 19:59, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > I don't think that's generally true.
If you think that, from a risk perspective it is enough for me to continue to investigate and I have been doing that. As I said before I thought I had found a problem. I'm suggesting we take the approach that if there is a problem we can recreate it as a way of exploring what conditions are required and therefore work out the impact. Nikhil Sontakke appears to have re-created something, but not quite what I had expected. I think he will post here tomorrow with an update for us to discuss. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
