On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 03:36:39AM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > On 2 May 2017 at 00:10, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 20 April 2017 at 07:29, Euler Taveira <eu...@timbira.com.br> wrote: > >> 2017-04-19 1:32 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>> I vote for "location" -> "lsn". I would expect complains about the > >>> current inconsistency at some point, and the function names have been > >>> already changed for this release.. > > > > OK, so I've created a draft patch which does this. > > I ended up adding this to the open items list. I feel it's best to be > on there so that we don't forget about this. > > If we decide not to do it then we can just remove it from the list, > but it would be a shame to release the beta having forgotten to make > this change. > > Do any of the committers who voted for this change feel inclined to > pick this patch up?
I'll echo that question. This open item lacks a clear owner. One might argue that 806091c caused it by doing the backward-compatibility breaks that inspired this patch, but that's a link too tenuous to create ownership. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers