On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Oh!  Good catch.  Given that the behavior in question is intentional
>> there and intended to provide backward compatibility, changing it in
>> back-branches doesn't seem like a good plan.  I'll adjust the patch so
>> that it continues to ignore errors in that case.
>
> Updated patch attached.
>

Patch looks good to me.


-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to