On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> Oh! Good catch. Given that the behavior in question is intentional >> there and intended to provide backward compatibility, changing it in >> back-branches doesn't seem like a good plan. I'll adjust the patch so >> that it continues to ignore errors in that case. > > Updated patch attached. >
Patch looks good to me. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
