On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Oh! Good catch. Given that the behavior in question is intentional >>> there and intended to provide backward compatibility, changing it in >>> back-branches doesn't seem like a good plan. I'll adjust the patch so >>> that it continues to ignore errors in that case. >> >> Updated patch attached. > > Patch looks good to me.
I'm having second thoughts based on some more experimentation I did this morning. I'll update again once I've had a bit more time to poke at it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
