Hi Stephen, On 2017/05/06 12:28, Stephen Frost wrote: > Noah, > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 23:19 Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 05:47:02PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: >>> * Amit Langote (amitlangot...@gmail.com) wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> >> wrote: >>>>> Assuming this looks good to you, I'll push it tomorrow, possibly with >>>>> other minor adjustments and perhaps a few more tests. >>>> >>>> Your latest patch looks good to me. >>> >>> Found a few more issues (like pg_dump not working against older versions >>> of PG, because the queries for older versions hadn't been adjusted) and >>> did a bit more tidying. >>> >>> I'll push this in a couple of hours. >> >> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly >> send >> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent >> status >> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com >> >> I see you did commit a related patch. Is this item done? > > > Yes, I believe it to be. I anticipate reviewing the code in this area more > in the coming weeks, but this specific issue can be marked as resolved.
Thanks for committing the patch after improving it quite a bit, and sorry that I couldn't reply promptly during the last week due to vacation. Regards, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers