On 5/6/17 14:50, Noah Misch wrote:
>> I consider this item low priority and don't plan to work on it before
>> all the other open items under logical replication are addressed.
>> (Here, working on it would include thinking further about whether it is
>> necessary at all or what alternatives might look like.)
> That's informative, but it's not a valid status update.  This PostgreSQL 10
> open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send a valid status
> update within 24 hours.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

Fair enough.  I have set myself a reminder to report back on May 30.

Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to