On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:59:27AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I imagine that pg_dump -s would be the basic operation that users > > would do first before creating a subcription on a secondary node, but > > what I find surprising is that publications are dumped by default. I > > don't find confusing that those are actually included by default to be > > consistent with the way subcriptions are handled, what I find > > confusing is that there are no options to not dump them, and no > > options to bypass their restore. > > > > So, any opinions about having pg_dump/pg_restore --no-publications? > > And that's really a boring patch, giving the attached.
While it's consistent with surrounding code, I find the use of ints to express what is in essence a boolean condition puzzling. Any insights? Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
