On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 5/11/17 21:59, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I imagine that pg_dump -s would be the basic operation that users >>> would do first before creating a subcription on a secondary node, but >>> what I find surprising is that publications are dumped by default. I >>> don't find confusing that those are actually included by default to be >>> consistent with the way subcriptions are handled, what I find >>> confusing is that there are no options to not dump them, and no >>> options to bypass their restore. >>> >>> So, any opinions about having pg_dump/pg_restore --no-publications? >> >> And that's really a boring patch, giving the attached. > > committed
Thanks. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
