On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 5/11/17 21:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I imagine that pg_dump -s would be the basic operation that users
>>> would do first before creating a subcription on a secondary node, but
>>> what I find surprising is that publications are dumped by default. I
>>> don't find confusing that those are actually included by default to be
>>> consistent with the way subcriptions are handled, what I find
>>> confusing is that there are no options to not dump them, and no
>>> options to bypass their restore.
>>> So, any opinions about having pg_dump/pg_restore --no-publications?
>> And that's really a boring patch, giving the attached.
> committed


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to