On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Ashutosh Bapat > <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> Hash partitioning will partition the data based on the hash value of the >> partition key. Does that require collation? Should we throw an error/warning >> if >> collation is specified in PARTITION BY clause? > > Collation is only relevant for ordering, not equality. Since hash > opclasses provide only equality, not ordering, it's not relevant here. > I'm not sure whether we should error out if it's specified or just > silently ignore it. Maybe an ERROR is a good idea? But not sure. > IMHO, we could simply have a WARNING, and ignore collation, thoughts?
Updated patches attached. Regards, Amul
0001-Cleanup_v2.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-hash-partitioning_another_design-v5.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
