Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 5/15/17 23:45, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >>> +1. We should throw an error and add a line in documentation that >>> collation should not be specified for hash partitioned table.
>> Why is it even allowed in the parser then? > That grammar is common to all the partitioning strategies. It looks > like it's easy to handle collation for hash partitions in > transformation than in grammar. But, if we could handle it in grammar, > I don't have any objection to it. If you disallow something in the grammar, the error message is unlikely to be better than "syntax error". That's not very desirable. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers